U.S. Judge Doesn't Care About Supreme Court GPS Case

First, happy 2012 to everyone! :-)

Slashdot is running a discussion named Judge Doesn't Care About Supreme Court GPS Case.

Their summary: "The Supreme Court is currently deciding whether or not law enforcement needs a warrant before they put a GPS tracker on a person's car. A judge in St. Louis doesn't seem to care about that, though. He ruled last week (PDF) that the FBI didn't need a warrant to track the car of a state employee they suspected was collecting a paycheck without actually going to work. (Their suspicions were confirmed.) While in favor of corrupt government employees being caught, it's a bit disturbing that a federal judge would decide a warrant wasn't needed while the Supreme Court has said the issue is unclear."

Re: U.S. Judge Doesn't Care About Supreme Court GPS Case

So it would be less disturbing for a Federal judge to decide a warrant was needed while the Supreme Court has said the issue is unclear?  Why?  Is your default, allow the criminal to go free?

Re: U.S. Judge Doesn't Care About Supreme Court GPS Case

No matter how many laws there will be, they are all flawless ! So every criminal with a good lawyer may be allowed to go free.

Nedcon.ro

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><i><hr><img><p>
  • Link to Amazon products with: [amazon product_id inline|full|thumbnail|datadescriptor]. Example: [amazon 1590597559 thumbnail] or [amazon 1590597559 author]. Details are on the Amazon module handbook page.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.