shapefile

GeoTools 8.6 Released

The GeoTools community is pleased to announce the availability of GeoTools 8.6 for download from source forge:

This release is also deployed to the OSGeo Maven Repository. For more information on setting up your project with Maven consult the Quickstart.

About GeoTools 8.6
This is a bug fix release containing fixes and improvements, including:

  • Several fixes in the WFS client, making it work against TinyOWS and ArcGIS WFS server
  • Improvements in usage of filter fuctions from SLD (some functions did not properly convert their arguments from string to numeric)
  • Removed tiling artifacts when rendering oversampled grid coverages
  • Sped up the usage of FIDFilter objects in map rendering

Full details are available in Jira's release notes.

 

Upgrading from GeoTools 2.7

 

For those migrating from GeoTools 2.7, upgrade instructions are available. No additional GeoTools 2.7 released are scheduled. Thanks for using GeoTools, and Enjoy!
The GeoTools Community
http://geotools.org

Batch Geonews: shp.js, QMap, SPOT 6, Google Ground Truth Project, and much more

Here's the recent geonews in batch mode.

From the open source / data front:

From the Esri front:

From the Microsoft front:

From the Google front:

Interesting Directions Mag articles:

In the miscellaneous category:

In the maps category:

Batch Geonews: AutoCAD Worm, QGIS Cloud, Map Calls, Shapefile Spatial Index Revealed, and more

Here's the recent geonews in batch mode.

On the open source front:

On the Esri front:

On the web mapping front:

In the miscellaneous category:

In the maps category:

New Poll on 2011 and Poll Results on The Future of the Shapefile Format

About time we change our front page poll. The new poll asks you about what 2011 in geospatial will be like.

The results and comments on the poll about the future of the Shapefile format are pretty interesting. Out of 347 answers, 35% believe the shapefile will stay with us forever and 25% believe SpatiaLite will become the choice of many. Otherwise, it's pretty mixed results, 13% admit they don't know, 11% think that web services will eventually replace flat files, 8% think the GML standard will become widely used, the same amount of people believe ESRI's Geodatabase format will eventually replace the shapefile format. Please also take a look at the insightful comments shared by our users for that poll.

New Poll on the Future of the Shapefile Format and Results for our Initial Poll

Since the Shapefile vs SpatiaLite debate generated some discussion in the geoblogosphere last month, our new poll asks you what do you think the future of the shapefile format is. Related, last month we published an entry name SpatiaLite, the Shapefile of the Future? It's clearly not the first time the future of the shapefile format is discussed, see for example this Spring 2009 entry named The Shapefile 2.0 Manifesto.

Our initial poll asked our users about whether Slashgeo's reprojection (migrating to its new engine) was worth or not. Out of 163 answers, 40% believes that yes, this is an improvement, and another 26% answered "maybe, the future will tell us". Hopefully, only 3 people though all the work we done was wasted time. The rest, 31%, admitted they don't care what the site looks like and its features, just as long as they get their aggregated geonews.

I also removed the Welcome to the new Slashgeo.org! sticky story from the top of our main page. It's been there for over a month and a half, so all our regular readers are certainly aware of the major change by now!

The future of the Shapefile format?

Shapefiles will stay with us forever!
35% (120 votes)
ESRI's Geodatabase format will eventually replace it
8% (28 votes)
The GML standard will become widely-used
8% (28 votes)
SpatiaLite will become the choice of many
25% (88 votes)
Web services will replace flat files
11% (38 votes)
I don't know
13% (45 votes)
Total votes: 347

FOSS4G 2010 Notes: SpatiaLite, the Shapefile of the Future?

While we discussed SpatiaLite in the past (but the archives haven't been imported to this new site yet), here's the notes I took during Pirmin Kalberer's talk at FOSS4G 2010 named "SpatiaLite, the Shapefile of the Future?". In the notes below, Frank Warmerdam is the main developer of the famous GDAL/OGR library. In the discussion, people wondered about the status of the promised ESRI File GeoDatabase API.

  • SpatiaLite doesn't replace PostGIS as a real database
  • SpatiaLite is spatial extension to SQLite
  • Single file storage
  • Spatial data types and functions
  • Launched in March 2008
  • File based, so no server process
  • Well proven and widely used
  • Now with SQLite 3.7 reading and writing can proceed concurrently, which was not the case not so long ago - this is not activated by default, for backward compatibility issues
  • It supports OGC simple feature types, SQL-SF
  • Indexes for spatial data
  • Supports networks and routing
  • Raster data also supported
Syndicate content